PUBLICACIONES

Regret salience and the decoy effect

ISI: Regret salience and the decoy effect

EDGAR KAUSEL E., TERRY CONNOLLY., JOCHEN REB.

2013 - Journal Judgment and Decision Making - Vol. 8, Nº 2. Pp. 136-149

Abstract

Two experiments examined the impact on the decoy effect of making salient the possibility of post-decision regret, a manipulation that has been shown in several earlier studies to stimulate critical examination and improvement of decision process. Experiment 1 (N = 62) showed that making regret salient eliminated the decoy effect in a personal preference task. Experiment 2 (N = 242) replicated this finding for a different personal preference task and for a prediction task.   It also replicated previous findings that external accountability demands do not reduce, and may exacerbate, the decoy effect. We interpret both effects in terms of decision justification, with different justification standards operating for different audiences. The decoy effect, in this account, turns on accepting a weak justification, which may be seen as adequate for an external audience or one’s own inattentive self but inadequate under the more critical review triggered by making regret possibilities salient. Seeking justification to others (responding to accountability demands) thus maintains or exacerbates the decoy effect; seeking justification to oneself (responding to regret salience) reduces or eliminates it. The proposed mechanism provides a theoretical account both of the decoy effect itself and of how regret priming provides an effective debiasing procedure for it.   Two experiments examined the impact on the decoy effect of making salient the possibility of post-decision regret, a manipulation that has been shown in several earlier studies to stimulate critical examination and improvement of decision process. Experiment 1 (N = 62) showed that making regret salient eliminated the decoy effect in a personal preference task. Experiment 2 (N = 242) replicated this finding for a different personal preference task and for a prediction task. It also replicated previous findings that external accountability demands do not reduce, and may exacerbate, the decoy effect. We interpret both effects in terms of decision justification, with different justification standards operating for different audiences. The decoy effect, in this account, turns on accepting a weak justification, which may be seen as adequate for an external audience or one’s own inattentive self but inadequate under the more critical review triggered by making regret possibilities salient. Seeking justification to others (responding to accountability demands) thus maintains or exacerbates the decoy effect; seeking justification to oneself (responding to regret salience) reduces or eliminates it. The proposed mechanism provides a theoretical account both of the decoy effect itself and of how regret priming provides an effective debiasing procedure for it.

Keywords

Decision making, anticipated regret, decoy effect, accountability, justifiability, regret salience, regret priming

¿Quieres seguir leyendo? [Accede a la publicación completa]

El no utilizar estándares de sostenibilidad significa que algo estamos dejando de hacer

La crisis surgida en Quintero y Puchuncaví deja abiertas varias interrogantes que por ahora parecen estar lejos de resolverse, pues más allá de los episodios concretos que se v...

La Universidad de Chile propone mejorar los sesgos generados hacia las mujeres en el mundo laboral

Es necesario fortalecer y transferir herramientas conceptuales sobre el impacto que generan las diferencias de género en el trabajo. El pasado 09 de Agosto. El Observatorio de Gest...

Todos los Derechos © 2014 | Departamento de Administración - Facultad de Economía y Negocios - Universidad de Chile - Diagonal Paraguay 257, torre 26, oficina 1101, piso 11, Santiago, Chile.