PUBLICACIONES

Regret salience and the decoy effect

ISI: Regret salience and the decoy effect

TERRY CONNOLLY., EDGAR KAUSEL E., JOCHEN REB.

2013 - Journal Judgment and Decision Making - Vol. 8, Nº 2. Pp. 136-149

Abstract

Two experiments examined the impact on the decoy effect of making salient the possibility of post-decision regret, a manipulation that has been shown in several earlier studies to stimulate critical examination and improvement of decision process. Experiment 1 (N = 62) showed that making regret salient eliminated the decoy effect in a personal preference task. Experiment 2 (N = 242) replicated this finding for a different personal preference task and for a prediction task.   It also replicated previous findings that external accountability demands do not reduce, and may exacerbate, the decoy effect. We interpret both effects in terms of decision justification, with different justification standards operating for different audiences. The decoy effect, in this account, turns on accepting a weak justification, which may be seen as adequate for an external audience or one’s own inattentive self but inadequate under the more critical review triggered by making regret possibilities salient. Seeking justification to others (responding to accountability demands) thus maintains or exacerbates the decoy effect; seeking justification to oneself (responding to regret salience) reduces or eliminates it. The proposed mechanism provides a theoretical account both of the decoy effect itself and of how regret priming provides an effective debiasing procedure for it.   Two experiments examined the impact on the decoy effect of making salient the possibility of post-decision regret, a manipulation that has been shown in several earlier studies to stimulate critical examination and improvement of decision process. Experiment 1 (N = 62) showed that making regret salient eliminated the decoy effect in a personal preference task. Experiment 2 (N = 242) replicated this finding for a different personal preference task and for a prediction task. It also replicated previous findings that external accountability demands do not reduce, and may exacerbate, the decoy effect. We interpret both effects in terms of decision justification, with different justification standards operating for different audiences. The decoy effect, in this account, turns on accepting a weak justification, which may be seen as adequate for an external audience or one’s own inattentive self but inadequate under the more critical review triggered by making regret possibilities salient. Seeking justification to others (responding to accountability demands) thus maintains or exacerbates the decoy effect; seeking justification to oneself (responding to regret salience) reduces or eliminates it. The proposed mechanism provides a theoretical account both of the decoy effect itself and of how regret priming provides an effective debiasing procedure for it.

Keywords

Decision making, anticipated regret, decoy effect, accountability, justifiability, regret salience, regret priming

¿Quieres seguir leyendo? [Accede a la publicación completa]

La transformación digital que viene

Cristián Maulén, Director del Observatorio de Sociedad Digital del Departamento de Administración de la Facultad de Economía y Negocios de la Universidad de Chile. ...

Los desafíos de la energía asequible no contaminante

Según el Informe de Sostenibilidad, “Chile y sus regiones, 2015”, del Observatorio de Sostenibilidad de la Facultad de Economía y Negocios de la Universidad de Chile (FEN)...

Todos los Derechos © 2014 | Departamento de Administración - Facultad de Economía y Negocios - Universidad de Chile - Diagonal Paraguay 257, torre 26, oficina 1101, piso 11, Santiago, Chile.